Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Mother's Day Traveling

My mother and a few other loved ones and I traveled to San Francisco by train over the weekend to celebrate Mother's Day. The adventure provided ample opportunity for panic, mild freak-outs, blisters, and cranky arguments, but also allowed me to experience several random acts of kindness and filled me with love. Here's our journey.

We traveled from Sacramento on Amtrak. We were traveling with women of all ages, including an eleven-year-old and her collection of Polly Pockets (had to throw the pic in of the Pocket girls all laid out on the dining car table, two in significant dialogue). As someone who's direly afraid of riding in cars (I blame an ex-boyfriend who claimed he'd once taken a speed racer course and would scare the bejeezus out of me by whipping in and out of traffic), the train offers such a lovely way to relax and enjoy the view--and the people. Helpful matronly women letting young college kids know when their stop arrived, kids running down aisles and stopping to smile at other kids they don't know--"hey, I have no clue who you are, but we're on a train together, so isn't this awesome?", and giggling sorority sisters yacking about--well, about yacking the night before--but still, they were sweet, if not a little hung over.

We headed out from Sacramento and rocked along for miles, passing sloughs, wetlands, the Mothball Fleet, and my favorite, the S&H sugar refinery, until we transfered to a bus to get us into the city proper.



Once there, we were convinced by the younger people in our group to tug our luggage along behind us as we explored Pier 39 and the Maritime Museum, including the historic boats there. Note to self: insist on dropping off luggage at hotel prior to sightseeing. Rolling suitcases may not weigh much, but when rolled over other tourist's toes, can cause not-so-happy reactions. That said, plenty of people stopped to help us lift our bags up gangplanks, or joke with us about how San Francisco has so much to offer one doesn't want to spend a moment in the hotel. Shall comment on other reasons why one wouldn't want to spend much time in hotel later.


When we finally arrived at our hotel, with me exhausted and now bearing several new blisters, I realized why I should always be the one to make the hotel arrangements. Some in our group stay at this hotel often, primarily due to its cost (or lack of) and proximity to the event we had planned to attend that night. Me, I'd rather spend what hard-earned money I have on a nice hotel and take a bus. Don't get me wrong--I'm no wimp. I was raised on a farm and can handle dirt and critters, but there was a spider between my sheets. A big, dark brown, napping spider. As my friend pointed out, at least we knew since the spider was alive that the building was "green." I shot her a look and grumbled to myself that I'd almost prefer to live in a toxic sludge. I wanted to call the front desk, but my mom grabbed a tissue and tossed it out the door. Live long and prosper, spider, just not in my bed.

A quick trip back to Pier 39 for dinner was in order, followed by a contemporary ballet performance at a fantastic venue on an old wharf. We walked back to the hotel afterward, chilled but happy. There's something I love about walking the residential streets of a city at night. There's a sweet quietude about the place that only hours ago had been bustling with life and activity. Living in a small town we don't get much of the mix of residential and city life, and I enjoy the experience every time. We came to the end of the residential street, and there at the corner, a group of men walked past us, headed to the mini-mart. One of them stopped, turned back, and flashed us a huge grin and said, "Happy Mother's Day, ladies." With ten minutes until the official start of Mother's Day, we felt blessed by this stranger's heartfelt wish.


Breakfast at the Squat & Gobble came before a visit to the aquarium, where I fell in love with the jellyfish and the bat rays. After that, we headed home.

What all of us found inspiring was that every time we turned around, someone was being kind or helpful. A young English man pointed out our bus (hidden behind a tour monstrosity), a shabbily dressed man overheard me muttering about not knowing where to catch a taxi and stopped collecting recyclables from the bin to point out the best spot on my map, and an East Indian woman, who spoke no English, communicated with my mother in sign language about the love of being a mother. I may have disagreed with a spider over who should nap in the hotel bed, have ended up with more blisters on my feet than Band-Aids, and have freaked out over my missing bus, but I came home from this short trip filled to the brim with the kindness of others.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Laughter at Birth and an Interview

Tomorrow is my birthday, and I'll be turning (oh, yeah, right . . . like I'm really going to divulge my age). What I will divulge, however, is a secret: on the day I was born the first thing that happened to me was that I was laughed at.

That's right. Laughed at. By my mother. Now, it isn't as bad as it sounds. See, she was a bit of a tiny woman, narrow hips and slender frame. You know how some women look like they're carrying a grapefruit when they're pregnant, and others appear to have a watermelon or two stuck up their shirts? The latter was my mother. And I was the watermelon. Oddly enough, I only weighed about six and a half pounds when I was born, but apparently my mom's body hadn't made much room for me while I was busy cooking. So I came out squished.

Really, really squished.

Beyond squished, actually. My foot was pressed against my shin and wouldn't flop its way down to proper foot position, and my nose was mashed sideways against my face. I was wrinkled all over and quite pruney, like most newborn babies. But my mother had never seen a newborn baby before, and here I was, her daughter, the infant she'd longed to see for so long, all wrinkled and squished up. And so she laughed. My mother took one look at me and laughed.

You'd think I'd have some sort of a complex over this, but I must admit, I love the idea of being born to laughter. You see, Mom wasn't laughing at me, she wasn't insulting me with her laughter; rather, she was laughing with joy and true amusement and with delighted amusement of how ironic life can be. After all, babies are supposed to be perfect and beautiful, right? And hers was so massively squished. There are differences between mean laughter and delighted laughter, and I was lucky enough to be born to delighted laughter. And when my mom recalls my birth, she and I share in the laughter.

My foot righted itself, as did my squished little nose. There's still a slight tilt to my nose, but nothing that doesn't show unless someone's staring straight into my nostrils. I tend to avoid those situations. But the legacy of the day I was born lives on in laughter. Each year, I approach my birthday with a bit of humor involved. I have dinner with my folks and we laugh. I find my friends and we share a bottle of wine and laugh. This year I'm celebrating my birthday a day early by heading over to Phoebe Jordan's blog, Talk About My Favorite Authors. Come find out a little bit more about me as a writer, and maybe we'll find a few things to laugh about, too.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Writing Tip: Who Not That - Think Whoville

Naughty me . . . here I've promised writing tips and have delivered only a few. Okay, here's a brief tip.

I'm currently editing a non-fiction piece and have found numerous places throughout the document where the writer has referred to people as "that." Okay, so although this "who" versus "that" debate has been ongoing for ages, and although the use of "who" for a person and "that" for an object isn't a hard and fast grammar rule, here's my opinion:

Don't "that" a "who"!

Please don't refer to a person as a "that;" refer to them as a "who." Think Whoville. You know, from Horton Hears a Who. Here's what I mean:

WRONG: "Elle heard the Who in Whoville that hollered to Horton."

CORRECT: "Elle heard the Who in Whoville who hollered to Horton."

Since using "that" for a person isn't technically incorrect, why do I make such a big deal about it? Why do I have this preference? Why do I insist my writers use "who" when referring to a person and "that" when referring to an object? Because like so many others, I grew up on Dr. Seuss, who taught us "A person's a person, no matter how small." After all, the town in Horton Hears a Who was called Whoville, not Thatville, right?? And that, folks, is just my humble opinion.

Monday, April 27, 2009

REKINDLED FIRE Release!

The erotic romance anthology I edited (and included one of my own short stories) will be released next month. Rekindled Fire: An Anthology of Reunited Lovers will be released some time in May.

Rekindled Fire traces the stories of ten couples who lose each other, only to find their way back together once again. The love stories here contain two unifying elements: profound love and erotic, passionate heat. Whether the story is contemporary or features magic, vampires or shape shifting; whether it involves spanking, bondage, or simply pure, unadulterated sex; or whether the couples have been torn apart for several months or one hundred years; one question remains the same: will these former lovers be able to rekindle the flame of love?

Saturday, April 18, 2009

I'm out in the world!

This week is a busy one for me. Today I'm over at Raine's Delight, chatting with other Ravenous Romance authors. Raine has asked some intriguing and thoughtful questions. Join us! http://tinyurl.com/cmaa5z

Also, the Ornery Eleven (eleven Ravenous Romance authors) are on a blog tour. We'll be visiting thirteen blogs in as many days. First stop, Zhadi's Den. Come on over and learn a bit more about your favorite Ravenous Romance author - maybe you'll meet a new author you'll come to love! http://www.danafredsti.com/blog/?p=297

Here's the blog tour information:

4/19 - Jennifer’s Random Musings - Elle Amery
4/20 - Unbound - Lisa Lane
4/21 - Talk About My Favorite Authors - Angela Cameron
4/22 - Kissa Starling - Em Lynley
4/23 - The Countess - Jamaica Layne
4/24 - PNR Inklings Blog at ParaNormal Romance - Sèphera Girón
4/25 - Wicked Thorn and Roses - Isabel Roman
4/27 - Sia McKaye’s Thoughts on… - Neve Black
4/29 - Bryn Greenwood - C. Margery Kempe
4/30 - Bookwenches - Savannah Chase
5/1 - Neve Black - Inara LaVey
5/2 - Night Owl Romances - The Fabulous Wrap Up Stop!


And finally, I'll be attending the Romantic Times convention this coming week, in Orlando Florida. Keep an eye out for me - I'd be happy to chat!

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

I've Stormed Keta's Keep!

Come visit me today over at Keta's Keep - the fantastic blog belonging to the amazing writer, Keta Diablo, author of Land of Falling Stars. All three Quartzton series books are listed, and I've added a few excerpts from the books - fun!

Thursday, March 19, 2009

My Trilogy is Going to Print! - CONTEST

I'm beyond thrilled to announce that all three current books in my Quartzton series, Saving Sophie, Grace on Fire, and Tally's Gift will be going to print soon, available through Amazon. These three novels are among the dozen selected by my publisher, Ravenous Romance, to go into print.

Given that I live out in the boondocks where dial-up is the only way many of my friends can access the Internet, it's a big thrill to be able to offer my books in print. Plus, this appeals to many die-hard print readers.

To celebrate the print release, I will be giving away a print copy of the first book in the series, Saving Sophie, to one randomly selected contestant. All you have to do to enter to win is to sign up for my newsletter on my website (click here) between now and April 30th. Put in the Subject Line "Print Book Contest." One entry per participant, please. The winner will be randomly selected on May 1, 2009.

Best,
Elle Amery